Subject: Re: raw 3.1 professional custom profiles for highend digital cameras
I took several more series of shots this afternoon, which I will look at tonight. First, I metered on what I selected as the desireable highlight and bracketed from there. Then I repeated the shots, except that I metered on a Zone IX highlight. The only Zone IX highlight, however, was the bright, hazy sky, and I don't think that will prove to be satisfactory. But, I will check out the shots in ACR.
I will also check out the view of the histogram from Capture, which I do own but don't use because, of course ACR is far superior...
I do appreciate the fact the there is a difference of opinion regarding which highlights to push, although I certainly don't possess the knowledge or experience to weigh in on that (which is why I will continue to run my experiments). I have been relying on the explanations of linear gamma in Bruce Fraser's book, which I can at least understand, and his explanations make sense to me.
As I noted before, the in-camera histogram appeared to show LESS overexposure that the ACR histogram in the three shots that I posted. I will check this out again, but, assuming that this is so, it seems backward to me. Any ideas?
View All Messages in adobe.photoshop.camera.raw
raw 3.1 professional custom profiles for highend digital cameras =>
Copyright © 2006 WatermarkFactory.com. All Rights Reserved.